Search for: "Stone v. Advantage Sales "
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 12:45 am
Stone Electrical Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc is a decision of the Controller of the Irish Patents Office dating back to last August, but again it's one of those somewhat overlooked rulings that is worth bringing to the attention of this weblog's trade mark-oriented readers. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
” There was, it follows, a lot of reputation for parties to take advantage of, including purchasing AdWords from Google which included Rosetta Stone’s trade marks. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
A magazine publishes the statement that most of the sales staff of a department store are homosexuals. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:29 pm
“Sticks and stones will break my bones …but words will (also) hurt me! [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:19 pm
Direct Shopping Network, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
Of contemporary bands the Who and the Stones look like better bets ...]. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:25 pm
In a footnote, the court explains: Trademark infringement law is primarily concerned with stopping one person or entity from gaining an unfair competitive advantage over a business rival by misusing a protected mark. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:34 pm
Arnold v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:34 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:06 am
In the first example, the fragility of the occupier’s interest is assumed to be taken advantage of by the selling landlord in default. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
You focus on the humanitarian, "not stones. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:33 pm
DWAYNE MAYO, Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
You are aiming to remove stones and mud by a sieving action. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
Litecoin Foundation Limited v (1) Inshallah Limited (2) Nasjet Limited (3) John Pepin [2021] EWHC 1998 (Ch) (July 2021) Litecoin is a cryptocurrency, promoted and developed by the claimant. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Young, 13-95, yet another state-on-top habeas case (this time from the Second Circuit), concerns a whole slew of habeas fun, but in the main asks whether the state can forfeit application of the old rule from Stone v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
Princo v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm
ACCC v Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) commenced action against Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) back in 2018 for making false claims that its tourists souvenirs, including didgeridoos, boomerangs, message stones and bull-roarers, all painted in Indigenous styles, were made in Australia and hand painted by Indigenous persons, when this was not the case. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm
ACCC v Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) commenced action against Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) back in 2018 for making false claims that its tourists souvenirs, including didgeridoos, boomerangs, message stones and bull-roarers, all painted in Indigenous styles, were made in Australia and hand painted by Indigenous persons, when this was not the case. [read post]
